{"status":true,"post":{"id":54614,"user_id":7,"status":1,"type":1,"orde":null,"notification_type":3,"static_post":0,"published_at":"2024-08-26 07:34:00","created_at":"2024-08-26T04:34:00.000000Z","updated_at":"2024-08-26T04:34:00.000000Z","edited_at":"2024-12-17 22:35:21","source_id":null,"post_id":54614,"is_featured":0,"title":"Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fen m\u00fcfetti\u015f tespitleri ne kadar ge\u00e7erli?","slider_title":null,"slider_title_2":null,"slider_spot_title":null,"slider_spot_title_2":null,"home_title":null,"sub_title":null,"category_id":73,"description":"\u0130SA KARAKA\u015e","content":"


<\/span><\/strong><\/p>


<\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u0130\u015f\u00e7i ve i\u015fveren aras\u0131ndaki fazla mesai \u00fccretine ili\u015fkin ihtilaflarda, \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcfetti\u015flerinin tutanaklar\u0131, aksi kan\u0131tlan\u0131ncaya kadar ge\u00e7erli. Ancak Yarg\u0131tay, \u2018\u00fc\u00e7 vardiya sistemiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015fyerlerinde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lamaz\u2019 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde emsal nitelikteki bir kararla bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda yol g\u00f6steriyor. \u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u0130\u015f\u00e7i ve i\u015fverenler aras\u0131nda ba\u015fl\u0131ca ihtilaflardan biri de fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Hizmet akdiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam eden i\u015f\u00e7iler, bu alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na m\u00fcracaat imkan\u0131na sahip. Mezkur Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Rehberlik ve Tefti\u015f Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6revlendirdi\u011fi m\u00fcfetti\u015fler marifetiyle i\u015f\u00e7ilerin fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve di\u011fer \u015fikayet konular\u0131n\u0131 kapsaml\u0131 bir \u015fekilde inceleyerek tutana\u011fa ba\u011fl\u0131yor ve nihayetinde rapor d\u00fczenliyor. M\u00fcfetti\u015fler taraf\u0131ndan tanzim edilen tutanaklar, yasa gere\u011fi aksi sabit olana kadar ge\u00e7erli. Peki, tanzim edilen m\u00fcfetti\u015f tutana\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n yerle\u015fik karar\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fiyorsa durum ne olacak? \u0130\u015fte bu konu, emsal nitelikteki Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 muvacehesinde bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Karar\u0131 veren daire ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131: Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

9. Hukuk Dairesi\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Karar bilgileri: Esas No:2024\/1076,\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Karar No: 2024\/4533<\/span><\/p>

Yasal dayana\u011f\u0131: 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nun \u2018Fazla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u00dccreti\u2019 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 41. maddesinde; \u201cFazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 ko\u015fullar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, haftal\u0131k 45 saati a\u015fan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalard\u0131r. 63. madde h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re denkle\u015ftirme esas\u0131n\u0131n uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerde, i\u015f\u00e7inin haftal\u0131k ortalama \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi, normal haftal\u0131k i\u015f s\u00fcresini a\u015fmamak ko\u015fulu ile baz\u0131 haftalarda toplam 45 saati a\u015fsa dahi bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma say\u0131lmaz.\u201d \u00a0Ayn\u0131 kanunun \u2018Yetkili makam ve memurlar\u2019 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 92. maddesinde; \u201c\u00c7al\u0131\u015fma hayat\u0131n\u0131 izleme, denetleme ve tefti\u015fe yetkili i\u015f m\u00fcfetti\u015fleri taraf\u0131ndan tutulan tutanaklar aksi kan\u0131tlan\u0131ncaya kadar ge\u00e7erlidir\u201d yer alan h\u00fck\u00fcmler, uygulaman\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 te\u015fkil ediyor.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

KARARIN KONUSU<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi, akabinde de karar, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edildi. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda; davaya konu m\u00fcfetti\u015f raporunda d\u00e2hili daval\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ara dinlenme kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, haftada 3 saat fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, raporda i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelendi\u011fi, davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n beyan\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davac\u0131 \u015firketin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verildi.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Bunun \u00fczerine mezkur Yarg\u0131tay Dairesi\u2019ne intikal ettirilen davada; davac\u0131 vekili \u00f6zetle; tefti\u015f raporunun ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ge\u00e7ersizli\u011finin tespiti gerekirken haks\u0131z olarak davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fini, i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan d\u00f6rt i\u015f\u00e7inin de puantaj kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n tutuldu\u011funu, yapt\u0131klar\u0131 fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve tatil g\u00fcnleri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fccretlerin \u00f6dendi\u011fini, eksik incelemeyle tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Davac\u0131 vekili; tefti\u015f raporuna konu d\u00f6rt i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00fc\u00e7 vardiya ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlara g\u00f6re \u00fc\u00e7 vardiya sisteminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti tahakkuk etmeyece\u011fini, tefti\u015f raporunun bu y\u00f6nden hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak tanzim edilmesine ra\u011fmen s\u0131rf tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 esas al\u0131narak davan\u0131n reddinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia etti. Ayr\u0131ca, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n ispat\u0131 konusunda i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131, \u00f6zellikle i\u015fyerine giri\u015f \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6steren belgeler, i\u015fyeri i\u00e7 yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 incelenmeden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurularak yaz\u0131l\u0131 belgeye kar\u015f\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 belge ile ispat kural\u0131n\u0131n bertaraf edildi\u011fini, yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlara g\u00f6re i\u015f\u00e7inin fiilen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin niteli\u011fi ve yo\u011funlu\u011funa g\u00f6re de fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u2018FAZLA \u00c7ALI\u015eMA DE\u011e\u0130L\u2019<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Fazla mesai uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nda yeterli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan uygulamada Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131 yol g\u00f6sterici oluyor. Buna g\u00f6re, inceleme konusu Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n 9. Hukuk Dairesi karar\u0131nda, \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6zellikle m\u00fcfetti\u015f taraf\u0131ndan \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma tespiti yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde bu tespitin ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan b\u00fcy\u00fck ehemmiyet arz ediyor.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan kararda Yarg\u0131tay \u00f6zetle; \u201cDosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re daval\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya d\u00fczeninde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011fildir. Dairemizin yerle\u015fik uygulamas\u0131 gere\u011fince \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n fiilen m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Her ne kadar davac\u0131 \u015firkete ait i\u015fyerinin istasyon b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ara dinlenme kullanmadan ve i\u015fin ba\u015f\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmadan \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 taraf tan\u0131klar\u0131nca belirtilse de her \u015feyden \u00f6nce, \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde 8 saatlik zaman diliminde zorunlu ihtiya\u00e7lar nedeniyle en az yar\u0131m saatlik ara dinlenmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Zira ara dinlenmenin mutlaka i\u015fyeri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n aranmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, daval\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretine hak kazanacak \u015fekilde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine reddine karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur\u201d \u00a0sonucuna var\u0131yor.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dc VARD\u0130YA S\u0130STEM\u0130NDE FAZLA \u00c7ALI\u015eMA YAPILAMAZ<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fyerinde i\u015f\u00e7ilerin fazla mesailerinin verilmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015fikayetlerine binaen yap\u0131lan tefti\u015f neticesinde, m\u00fcfetti\u015f taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f\u00e7ilerin fazla mesai yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tutanakla tespit edildi. Buna ra\u011fmen inceleme konusu bu Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131nda; Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya \u00a0\u015feklindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00fczeni uygulanan i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin belirli olmas\u0131 nedeniyle fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki yerle\u015fik karar\u0131na binaen m\u00fcfetti\u015f tutana\u011f\u0131 ge\u00e7erli kabul edilmedi. Kararda; i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ara dinlenme kullanmadan ve i\u015fin ba\u015f\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmadan \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 taraf tan\u0131klar\u0131nca belirtilse de her \u015feyden \u00f6nce, \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde 8 saatlik zaman diliminde zorunlu ihtiya\u00e7lar nedeniyle en az yar\u0131m saatlik ara dinlenmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc varsay\u0131ld\u0131. Bu varsay\u0131mda ara dinlenmenin mutlaka i\u015fyeri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n aranmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131. Netice itibar\u0131yla m\u00fcfetti\u015f tutana\u011f\u0131yla tespit edilse bile \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya \u015feklindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00fczeni uygulanan i\u015fyerlerinde 8 saatlik zaman diliminde zorunlu ihtiya\u00e7lar nedeniyle en az yar\u0131m saatlik ara dinlenmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki varsay\u0131mdan hareketle fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmiyor. Bu y\u00f6nde yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131 bir kez daha peki\u015fti. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i ve i\u015fverenlerin gereksiz ihtilaf ya\u015famamas\u0131 i\u00e7in bu karar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmas\u0131, i\u015fverenlerin \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sistemi dahi olsa \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n zorunlu ara dinlenmelerini kulland\u0131rtmalar\u0131 ve belgelemeleri her iki taraf\u0131n da lehine olacak.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>","slug":"yargitay-karariyla-celisen-mufettis-tespitleri-ne-kadar-gecerli","tags":"sgk sigorta i\u015f\u00e7i i\u015fveren mesai \u00fccret yarg\u0131tay","meta_title":"Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fen m\u00fcfetti\u015f tespitleri ne kadar ge\u00e7erli?","meta_description":"\u0130SA KARAKA\u015e","meta_keywords":"sgk sigorta i\u015f\u00e7i i\u015fveren mesai \u00fccret yarg\u0131tay","news_cover_min":"\/front\/uploads\/blog\/thumbnail\/1724619600G2ixyDPVExwXNvr.webp","news_cover":null,"news_video_min":null,"news_video":null,"view_count":1181,"cropped_1200x675":null,"user":{"id":7,"name":"\u0130SA","surname":"KARAKA\u015e","email":"igurmen@yandex.com.tr","slug":"isa-karakas","avatar":"\/front\/uploads\/avatar\/1733691600UsNll1YpnmquGG1.webp","status":1,"role":1,"email_verified_at":null,"orde":null,"created_at":"2022-09-15T09:39:41.000000Z","updated_at":"2024-12-18T10:20:38.000000Z","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null},"translations":[{"id":54740,"is_featured":0,"is_amp":0,"is_ads":0,"ads_link":null,"post_id":54614,"locale":"tr","category_id":73,"title":"Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fen m\u00fcfetti\u015f tespitleri ne kadar ge\u00e7erli?","home_title":null,"sub_title":null,"slider_title":null,"slider_title_2":null,"slider_spot_title":null,"slider_spot_title_2":null,"subtitleuse":0,"description":"\u0130SA KARAKA\u015e","content":"


<\/span><\/strong><\/p>


<\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u0130\u015f\u00e7i ve i\u015fveren aras\u0131ndaki fazla mesai \u00fccretine ili\u015fkin ihtilaflarda, \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcfetti\u015flerinin tutanaklar\u0131, aksi kan\u0131tlan\u0131ncaya kadar ge\u00e7erli. Ancak Yarg\u0131tay, \u2018\u00fc\u00e7 vardiya sistemiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015fyerlerinde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lamaz\u2019 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde emsal nitelikteki bir kararla bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda yol g\u00f6steriyor. \u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u0130\u015f\u00e7i ve i\u015fverenler aras\u0131nda ba\u015fl\u0131ca ihtilaflardan biri de fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Hizmet akdiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam eden i\u015f\u00e7iler, bu alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na m\u00fcracaat imkan\u0131na sahip. Mezkur Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Rehberlik ve Tefti\u015f Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6revlendirdi\u011fi m\u00fcfetti\u015fler marifetiyle i\u015f\u00e7ilerin fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve di\u011fer \u015fikayet konular\u0131n\u0131 kapsaml\u0131 bir \u015fekilde inceleyerek tutana\u011fa ba\u011fl\u0131yor ve nihayetinde rapor d\u00fczenliyor. M\u00fcfetti\u015fler taraf\u0131ndan tanzim edilen tutanaklar, yasa gere\u011fi aksi sabit olana kadar ge\u00e7erli. Peki, tanzim edilen m\u00fcfetti\u015f tutana\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n yerle\u015fik karar\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fiyorsa durum ne olacak? \u0130\u015fte bu konu, emsal nitelikteki Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 muvacehesinde bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Karar\u0131 veren daire ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131: Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

9. Hukuk Dairesi\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Karar bilgileri: Esas No:2024\/1076,\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Karar No: 2024\/4533<\/span><\/p>

Yasal dayana\u011f\u0131: 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nun \u2018Fazla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u00dccreti\u2019 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 41. maddesinde; \u201cFazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 ko\u015fullar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, haftal\u0131k 45 saati a\u015fan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalard\u0131r. 63. madde h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re denkle\u015ftirme esas\u0131n\u0131n uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerde, i\u015f\u00e7inin haftal\u0131k ortalama \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi, normal haftal\u0131k i\u015f s\u00fcresini a\u015fmamak ko\u015fulu ile baz\u0131 haftalarda toplam 45 saati a\u015fsa dahi bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma say\u0131lmaz.\u201d \u00a0Ayn\u0131 kanunun \u2018Yetkili makam ve memurlar\u2019 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 92. maddesinde; \u201c\u00c7al\u0131\u015fma hayat\u0131n\u0131 izleme, denetleme ve tefti\u015fe yetkili i\u015f m\u00fcfetti\u015fleri taraf\u0131ndan tutulan tutanaklar aksi kan\u0131tlan\u0131ncaya kadar ge\u00e7erlidir\u201d yer alan h\u00fck\u00fcmler, uygulaman\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 te\u015fkil ediyor.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

KARARIN KONUSU<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi, akabinde de karar, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edildi. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda; davaya konu m\u00fcfetti\u015f raporunda d\u00e2hili daval\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ara dinlenme kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, haftada 3 saat fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, raporda i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelendi\u011fi, davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n beyan\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davac\u0131 \u015firketin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verildi.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Bunun \u00fczerine mezkur Yarg\u0131tay Dairesi\u2019ne intikal ettirilen davada; davac\u0131 vekili \u00f6zetle; tefti\u015f raporunun ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ge\u00e7ersizli\u011finin tespiti gerekirken haks\u0131z olarak davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fini, i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan d\u00f6rt i\u015f\u00e7inin de puantaj kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n tutuldu\u011funu, yapt\u0131klar\u0131 fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve tatil g\u00fcnleri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fccretlerin \u00f6dendi\u011fini, eksik incelemeyle tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Davac\u0131 vekili; tefti\u015f raporuna konu d\u00f6rt i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00fc\u00e7 vardiya ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlara g\u00f6re \u00fc\u00e7 vardiya sisteminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti tahakkuk etmeyece\u011fini, tefti\u015f raporunun bu y\u00f6nden hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak tanzim edilmesine ra\u011fmen s\u0131rf tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 esas al\u0131narak davan\u0131n reddinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia etti. Ayr\u0131ca, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n ispat\u0131 konusunda i\u015fyeri kay\u0131tlar\u0131, \u00f6zellikle i\u015fyerine giri\u015f \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6steren belgeler, i\u015fyeri i\u00e7 yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 incelenmeden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurularak yaz\u0131l\u0131 belgeye kar\u015f\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 belge ile ispat kural\u0131n\u0131n bertaraf edildi\u011fini, yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlara g\u00f6re i\u015f\u00e7inin fiilen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin niteli\u011fi ve yo\u011funlu\u011funa g\u00f6re de fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u2018FAZLA \u00c7ALI\u015eMA DE\u011e\u0130L\u2019<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Fazla mesai uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nda yeterli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan uygulamada Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131 yol g\u00f6sterici oluyor. Buna g\u00f6re, inceleme konusu Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n 9. Hukuk Dairesi karar\u0131nda, \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6zellikle m\u00fcfetti\u015f taraf\u0131ndan \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma tespiti yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde bu tespitin ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan b\u00fcy\u00fck ehemmiyet arz ediyor.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan kararda Yarg\u0131tay \u00f6zetle; \u201cDosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re daval\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya d\u00fczeninde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011fildir. Dairemizin yerle\u015fik uygulamas\u0131 gere\u011fince \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n fiilen m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Her ne kadar davac\u0131 \u015firkete ait i\u015fyerinin istasyon b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ara dinlenme kullanmadan ve i\u015fin ba\u015f\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmadan \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 taraf tan\u0131klar\u0131nca belirtilse de her \u015feyden \u00f6nce, \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde 8 saatlik zaman diliminde zorunlu ihtiya\u00e7lar nedeniyle en az yar\u0131m saatlik ara dinlenmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Zira ara dinlenmenin mutlaka i\u015fyeri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n aranmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, daval\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretine hak kazanacak \u015fekilde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine reddine karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur\u201d \u00a0sonucuna var\u0131yor.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dc VARD\u0130YA S\u0130STEM\u0130NDE FAZLA \u00c7ALI\u015eMA YAPILAMAZ<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fyerinde i\u015f\u00e7ilerin fazla mesailerinin verilmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015fikayetlerine binaen yap\u0131lan tefti\u015f neticesinde, m\u00fcfetti\u015f taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f\u00e7ilerin fazla mesai yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tutanakla tespit edildi. Buna ra\u011fmen inceleme konusu bu Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131nda; Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya \u00a0\u015feklindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00fczeni uygulanan i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerinin belirli olmas\u0131 nedeniyle fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki yerle\u015fik karar\u0131na binaen m\u00fcfetti\u015f tutana\u011f\u0131 ge\u00e7erli kabul edilmedi. Kararda; i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ara dinlenme kullanmadan ve i\u015fin ba\u015f\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmadan \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 taraf tan\u0131klar\u0131nca belirtilse de her \u015feyden \u00f6nce, \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sisteminde 8 saatlik zaman diliminde zorunlu ihtiya\u00e7lar nedeniyle en az yar\u0131m saatlik ara dinlenmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc varsay\u0131ld\u0131. Bu varsay\u0131mda ara dinlenmenin mutlaka i\u015fyeri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n aranmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131. Netice itibar\u0131yla m\u00fcfetti\u015f tutana\u011f\u0131yla tespit edilse bile \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya \u015feklindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00fczeni uygulanan i\u015fyerlerinde 8 saatlik zaman diliminde zorunlu ihtiya\u00e7lar nedeniyle en az yar\u0131m saatlik ara dinlenmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki varsay\u0131mdan hareketle fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmiyor. Bu y\u00f6nde yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131 bir kez daha peki\u015fti. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i ve i\u015fverenlerin gereksiz ihtilaf ya\u015famamas\u0131 i\u00e7in bu karar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmas\u0131, i\u015fverenlerin \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc vardiya sistemi dahi olsa \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n zorunlu ara dinlenmelerini kulland\u0131rtmalar\u0131 ve belgelemeleri her iki taraf\u0131n da lehine olacak.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>","slug":"yargitay-karariyla-celisen-mufettis-tespitleri-ne-kadar-gecerli","orjinalimage":"\/front\/uploads\/blog\/thumbnail\/1724619600G2ixyDPVExwXNvr.webp","news_cover_min":"\/front\/uploads\/blog\/thumbnail\/1724619600G2ixyDPVExwXNvr.webp","news_cover":null,"news_video_min":null,"news_video":null,"cropped_638x552":null,"cropped_310x208":null,"cropped_416x247":null,"cropped_197x247":null,"cropped_416x600":null,"cropped_1200x675":null,"tags":"sgk sigorta i\u015f\u00e7i i\u015fveren mesai \u00fccret yarg\u0131tay","meta_title":"Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131yla \u00e7eli\u015fen m\u00fcfetti\u015f tespitleri ne kadar ge\u00e7erli?","meta_description":"\u0130SA KARAKA\u015e","meta_keywords":"sgk sigorta i\u015f\u00e7i i\u015fveren mesai \u00fccret yarg\u0131tay","view_count":1181,"yt":0,"ytid":"","ytimage":null,"imgdate":"2000-01-01 00:00:00","cuff_cover":null,"cropped_358x214":null,"cropped_842x474":null}]}}