{"status":true,"post":{"id":36029,"user_id":29,"status":1,"type":1,"orde":null,"notification_type":3,"static_post":0,"published_at":"2022-12-23 17:33:00","created_at":"2022-12-23T14:33:00.000000Z","updated_at":"2022-12-23T14:33:00.000000Z","edited_at":"2024-12-17 22:35:21","source_id":null,"post_id":36029,"is_featured":0,"title":"Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne hangi bireysel ba\u015fvurular kabul edilemez?","slider_title":null,"slider_title_2":null,"slider_spot_title":null,"slider_spot_title_2":null,"home_title":null,"sub_title":null,"category_id":73,"description":"AV. MUHAMMET AKSAN","content":"

Anayasa Mahkemesi bireysel ba\u015fvuru istatistiklerine g\u00f6re, 23 Eyl\u00fcl 2012 tarihinden 31 Aral\u0131k 2021 tarihine kadar toplam 302 bin 429 sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru bulunuyor. Bahse konu ba\u015fvurular\u0131n y\u00fczde 86.5\u2019i kabul edilmezlikle neticelendi. Ancak mahkemenin i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc ve hakim say\u0131s\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kabul edilmezlik kriterleri sayesinde gereksiz i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc azalt\u0131l\u0131yor ve sistemin t\u0131kanmas\u0131 engelleniyor. Bu durum, sistemin i\u015fleyi\u015finin daha sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na hizmet ediyor.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Mahkemenin belirledi\u011fi kriterler a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibidir:<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk (esasa ili\u015fkin):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

* Bir ihlalin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131<\/span><\/p>

* Karma\u015f\u0131k ve zorlama \u015fikayetler<\/span><\/p>

* Temellendirilmemi\u015f \u015fikayet<\/span><\/p>

* Kanun yolu \u015fikayeti<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Usule ili\u015fkin (esasa ili\u015fkin olmayan):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

* Ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi<\/span><\/p>

* Bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinde ba\u015fvuru yapmama (30 g\u00fcn)<\/span><\/p>

* Ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131<\/span><\/p>

* M\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

AYM\u2019nin yetkisine ili\u015fkin (esasa ili\u015fkin olmayan):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

* Konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik<\/span><\/p>

* Yer bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik<\/span><\/p>

* Zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik<\/span><\/p>

* Ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Cemal G\u00fcnsel ba\u015fvurusu\u00a0(No:2016\/12900):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Anayasa Mahkemesi, ancak temellendirilebilmi\u015f bir bireysel ba\u015fvuruyu inceler. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015fikayetlerini hem maddi hem de hukuki olarak desteklemesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvuruyu delillerle desteklemek gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u015fikayete konu \u00f6yk\u00fcn\u00fcn i\u00e7eri\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmam\u0131\u015f; yaln\u0131zca \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc bir yar\u0131\u015fmaya kat\u0131lmak \u00fczere g\u00f6ndermek istedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucu, metni ger\u00e7ekten var olan bir \u00f6yk\u00fc yar\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermemi\u015f; metni g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi ki\u015finin \u00f6yk\u00fcn\u00fcn yar\u0131\u015fmaya kat\u0131lmas\u0131nda ne t\u00fcr bir i\u015flevi olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 zamanda ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru konusu \u00f6yk\u00fc metninin istedi\u011fi ki\u015fiye g\u00f6nderilmemesi \u015feklindeki Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu m\u00fcdahalesinin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ifade etti\u011fini sadece soyut beyanlarla ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn neden ihlal edildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayan bir delil sunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 olarak, ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvurusuna konu etti\u011fi ihlal edilen temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin neden\/nas\u0131l ihlal edildi\u011fini temellendirememi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla mahkeme, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 sebebiyle (temellendirilmemi\u015f \u015fikayet) kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, ba\u015fvuru formunun ve eklerinin eksiksiz, kronolojik halde d\u00fczg\u00fcn haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, hangi hakk\u0131n hangi nedenle ihlal edildi\u011finin gerek\u00e7eler ve delillerle ortaya konulmas\u0131, soyut iddialarda bulunulmamas\u0131, somut kan\u0131t ve bulgulara yer verilmesi, soyut anayasal ilkelere dayanmamas\u0131, arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131 destekleyen belgelere mutlaka yer verilmesi ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n yeterli olmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu nedenle bireysel ba\u015fvuru yoluna gidilecek dosyalarda, iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n \u00f6zenle haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 ile ba\u015fvuru dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n titizlikle ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekiyor.<\/span><\/p>","slug":"anayasa-mahkemesine-hangi-bireysel-basvurular-kabul-edilemez","tags":null,"meta_title":null,"meta_description":null,"meta_keywords":null,"news_cover_min":null,"news_cover":null,"news_video_min":null,"news_video":null,"view_count":1121,"cropped_1200x675":null,"user":{"id":29,"name":"MUHAMMET","surname":"AKSAN","email":"av-muhammet-aksan@gmail.com","slug":"av-muhammet-aksan","avatar":"\/front\/uploads\/avatar\/1733691600IewiFiiT1aT8ZK3.webp","status":1,"role":1,"email_verified_at":null,"orde":null,"created_at":"2022-10-24T10:51:30.000000Z","updated_at":"2024-12-18T09:45:38.000000Z","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null},"translations":[{"id":36155,"is_featured":0,"is_amp":0,"is_ads":0,"ads_link":null,"post_id":36029,"locale":"tr","category_id":73,"title":"Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne hangi bireysel ba\u015fvurular kabul edilemez?","home_title":null,"sub_title":null,"slider_title":null,"slider_title_2":null,"slider_spot_title":null,"slider_spot_title_2":null,"subtitleuse":0,"description":"AV. MUHAMMET AKSAN","content":"

Anayasa Mahkemesi bireysel ba\u015fvuru istatistiklerine g\u00f6re, 23 Eyl\u00fcl 2012 tarihinden 31 Aral\u0131k 2021 tarihine kadar toplam 302 bin 429 sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru bulunuyor. Bahse konu ba\u015fvurular\u0131n y\u00fczde 86.5\u2019i kabul edilmezlikle neticelendi. Ancak mahkemenin i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc ve hakim say\u0131s\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kabul edilmezlik kriterleri sayesinde gereksiz i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc azalt\u0131l\u0131yor ve sistemin t\u0131kanmas\u0131 engelleniyor. Bu durum, sistemin i\u015fleyi\u015finin daha sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na hizmet ediyor.<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Mahkemenin belirledi\u011fi kriterler a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibidir:<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk (esasa ili\u015fkin):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

* Bir ihlalin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131<\/span><\/p>

* Karma\u015f\u0131k ve zorlama \u015fikayetler<\/span><\/p>

* Temellendirilmemi\u015f \u015fikayet<\/span><\/p>

* Kanun yolu \u015fikayeti<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Usule ili\u015fkin (esasa ili\u015fkin olmayan):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

* Ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi<\/span><\/p>

* Bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinde ba\u015fvuru yapmama (30 g\u00fcn)<\/span><\/p>

* Ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131<\/span><\/p>

* M\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

AYM\u2019nin yetkisine ili\u015fkin (esasa ili\u015fkin olmayan):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

* Konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik<\/span><\/p>

* Yer bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik<\/span><\/p>

* Zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik<\/span><\/p>

* Ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Cemal G\u00fcnsel ba\u015fvurusu\u00a0(No:2016\/12900):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Anayasa Mahkemesi, ancak temellendirilebilmi\u015f bir bireysel ba\u015fvuruyu inceler. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015fikayetlerini hem maddi hem de hukuki olarak desteklemesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvuruyu delillerle desteklemek gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u015fikayete konu \u00f6yk\u00fcn\u00fcn i\u00e7eri\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmam\u0131\u015f; yaln\u0131zca \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc bir yar\u0131\u015fmaya kat\u0131lmak \u00fczere g\u00f6ndermek istedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucu, metni ger\u00e7ekten var olan bir \u00f6yk\u00fc yar\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermemi\u015f; metni g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi ki\u015finin \u00f6yk\u00fcn\u00fcn yar\u0131\u015fmaya kat\u0131lmas\u0131nda ne t\u00fcr bir i\u015flevi olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 zamanda ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru konusu \u00f6yk\u00fc metninin istedi\u011fi ki\u015fiye g\u00f6nderilmemesi \u015feklindeki Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu m\u00fcdahalesinin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ifade etti\u011fini sadece soyut beyanlarla ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn neden ihlal edildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayan bir delil sunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 olarak, ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvurusuna konu etti\u011fi ihlal edilen temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin neden\/nas\u0131l ihlal edildi\u011fini temellendirememi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla mahkeme, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 sebebiyle (temellendirilmemi\u015f \u015fikayet) kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, ba\u015fvuru formunun ve eklerinin eksiksiz, kronolojik halde d\u00fczg\u00fcn haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, hangi hakk\u0131n hangi nedenle ihlal edildi\u011finin gerek\u00e7eler ve delillerle ortaya konulmas\u0131, soyut iddialarda bulunulmamas\u0131, somut kan\u0131t ve bulgulara yer verilmesi, soyut anayasal ilkelere dayanmamas\u0131, arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131 destekleyen belgelere mutlaka yer verilmesi ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n yeterli olmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu nedenle bireysel ba\u015fvuru yoluna gidilecek dosyalarda, iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n \u00f6zenle haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 ile ba\u015fvuru dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n titizlikle ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekiyor.<\/span><\/p>","slug":"anayasa-mahkemesine-hangi-bireysel-basvurular-kabul-edilemez","orjinalimage":null,"news_cover_min":null,"news_cover":null,"news_video_min":null,"news_video":null,"cropped_638x552":null,"cropped_310x208":null,"cropped_416x247":null,"cropped_197x247":null,"cropped_416x600":null,"cropped_1200x675":null,"tags":null,"meta_title":null,"meta_description":null,"meta_keywords":null,"view_count":1121,"yt":0,"ytid":"","ytimage":null,"imgdate":"2000-01-01 00:00:00","cuff_cover":null,"cropped_358x214":null,"cropped_842x474":null}]}}